so to return to my idea, id like your opinion before making a formal proposal.
- a transparency dao consisting of probably just 1 person but could grow if the daos grow in a not so distant future.
this dao would make a report every 1/2/3/6/12 months depending on what we deside. personally I dont think we need one more often than every 3 months. an annual report could even do.
the idea is someone not connected to the daos ensuring openness and transparency.
it is also my personal opinion that this person should be hired on a need to basis so that we can vote each time who or maybe make a public announcement that we need someone from the outside to do the job.
so in that light maybe calling it a dao is not the right name for it since the person could change depending on what we decide.
- simple once a year or so like I said above go out and hire someone to do the job.
so in stead of having a dedicated dao we could have a recurring formalized in someway event that triggers the transparency report.
the difference in this report compared to the ones lex writes is that those are entirely economical i.e. where the money goes, and this report would be concerned with the actual openness of the work done by the daos.
we could call this report the state of transparency in devault. or something like this. a measure of how we are doing to help us not to drift.